lab 2

Which articles are updated most regularly in the last 2 years?
cobol: Updated:
23:11, 7 February 2010 Starfiend

Haskell: 06:38, 18 January 2010

Java: 03:52, 15 February 2010 Vsmith

Python:01:02, 6 February 2010

C++ 09:34, 17 February 2010

Is there any indication of how good each article is?

C++ : There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria.

Python: Python (programming language) should without doubt be moved to Python, and the disambiguation page linked from the top of that article. The article is easy to navigate too.

Java: THIS PAGE IS VERY BADLY WRITTEN and takes no account of the huge influx of people from other parts of Indonesia to settle in Java's cities.

Haskell: This article has not been reviewed nor has it been rated. It lacks certain qualities.

Cobol: I found this article not as usefull, less information than others, easy navigation.

Which articles are vandalised the most?
Out of all the articles i have revised. I found most of them have been vandalised a good bit and changed to an external extant. These three i found were the most changed and vandalised articles.
C++

Haskell

Cobol

Which are the most common titles used in these articles?

too little about cobol yet is one, common title for cobol. stuff removed from boolean data type article is another common titles out there.

Which original article is most similar to the current article? What does this indicate?
haskell article is most simlilar to the current article, this suggest that the article has not been changed much, and the information is most correct. Also means it has not been updated much.